ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8574
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 06 '20 at 09:50
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 134 2-Core 263 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 797 80% 650 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.5% Good	Lighting 82.2 Reflection 95.5 Parallax 89.4 67% 89 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 72 71% 90 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB 17,828 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 225GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 965 891 871 848 855 854 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 1,177 Write 1147 Mixed 1129 SusWrite 881 244% 1,083 MB/s	4K Read 58 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 76.3 246% 83 MB/s	DQ Read 1016 DQ Write 858 DQ Mixed 925 696% 933 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 306%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 931GB free Firmware: RPM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 166 169 173 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Read 156 Write 134 Mixed 75 SusWrite 170 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	80.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 31 MC Mixed 22.8 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 30.8 SC Mixed 26 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx Builds (Compare 3,421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 50%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,966x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	621x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	523x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,174x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	940x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	460x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	337x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	273x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples	193x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	681x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	225x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples	175x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback