Asus P8B WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B WS  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 08:10
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 177
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 442
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V7800 (FireGL)
AMD(1002 0306) 2GB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.720.0.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 14.5
17% 15.6 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 18.1
13% 15 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 346 354 364 364 364 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 115%
HPT DISK 0_1 300GB
278GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 196 192 197 196 197 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 190
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 195
123% 169 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.3
245% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B WS Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8B WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback