Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31230 2,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 91 2-Core 176 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 446 44% 360 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V7800 (FireGL) 27 User benchmarks, average bench 15% AMD(1002 0306) 2GB Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.720.0.0 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.7 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 14.4 17% 15.7 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 15.8 Splatting 18.1 13% 15 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 359 354 363 360 344 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 115%
HPT DISK 0_1 300GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 278GB free Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 192 198 196 197 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	113% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 197 Mixed 93 SusWrite 195 125% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.3 250% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 2x8GB 526 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 16.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

RAM
M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 39 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
CT51264BA160B.C16F 4x4GBCrucialBench 51%, 589 samples	4x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $655