TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 22:13
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
100% 183 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,200
102% 879 Pts
64-Core 1,189
74% 1,189 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 98.1%
 Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 135
Parallax 114
106% 126 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
113% 143 fps
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 168 76 5.2 88 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 493
Write 393
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 104
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 31.9
97% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 47.8
101% 202 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 69.1%
 Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$24
351GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 184 184 185 183 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 64.3
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 183
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$24
155GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 157 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 199
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 158
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.9
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 92.9%
 Great: 96%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME Z370M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370M-PLUS II

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples42x
Core i5-9600KIntel  $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples37x
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples29x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples29x
RTX 2070Nvidia  $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples15x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples14x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples11x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples10x
MEMPEK1W016GA 14GBIntelBench 207%, 866 samples8x
RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX  $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples16x
MTA8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 2x16GBUnknownBench 82%, 18 samples10x
BLS16G4D26BFSB.16FD 2x16GBCrucialBench 85%, 951 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback