Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '20 at 10:22
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$75 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 135 61% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 384 40% 320 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2871) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.3 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 31.9 21% 27.2 fps	MRender 33.3 Gravity 29.9 Splatting 25.9 24% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,539 Write 3,286 Mixed 3,126 740% 3,317 MB/s	4K Read 202 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 118 516% 144 MB/s	DQ Read 508 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 423 310% 411 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$65 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 29GB free Firmware: EXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 259 145 103 98 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 429 Mixed 412 SusWrite 177 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 48.3 162% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 181 153% 222 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 118%
Maxtor 6 Y160M0 164GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 22GB free Firmware: YAR5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 35.7 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 30.1 23% 30.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 33%
SanDisk SDSSDHII240G 240GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 71GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 211 218 216 216 216 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 266 Write 216 Mixed 152 SusWrite 213 278% 212 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 19.3 1,594% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 35.6 DQ Mixed 20.9 1,992% 25.1 MB/s
Poor: 161% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 271%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 50GB free, PID 0715 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 53 22 24 24 26 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 216 Mixed 269 SusWrite 68.3 255% 187 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 22.6 1,718% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 36.1 DQ Mixed 27.3 2,244% 29 MB/s
Poor: 141% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 289%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 58GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 30 Write 28.7 Mixed 28 SusWrite 28.9 39% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 65% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 37%
KINGSTON SV300S3 120GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 13GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 39 Write 38.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 36.5 52% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 12.1 1,005% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 11.2 DQ Write 18.3 DQ Mixed 13.8 1,133% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 148%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 240 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 19.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	867x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $75Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	147x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	111x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16