MSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 10:51
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 461
58% 439 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 43.7
Parallax 39.3
37% 42.8 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 40.1
Splatting 35.3
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 247 249 247 233 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
78.4% Very good
Read 265
Write 254
Mixed 249
SusWrite 242
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 46.1
146% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 142
109% 151 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 128%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
51GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 132 146 143 140 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 363
Write 205
Mixed 218
SusWrite 142
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 36.9
123% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 148
119% 166 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 85%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
9GB free
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 266
Write 254
Mixed 209
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 36.5
132% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 195
146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
537GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 155 160 161 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 153
Write 80.8
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 158
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 109%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB
112GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 49 38 36 37 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 336
Write 348
Mixed 279
SusWrite 80.8
340% 261 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 40.4
3,880% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 36.9
DQ Write 87
DQ Mixed 46.4
4,674% 56.8 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 289%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 59
68% 59 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD55 (MS-7751)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $484
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback