Asus GL552VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus GL552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VX
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 16:40
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 158
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 437
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1060) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4550
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 2.91
2% 6.53 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.96
4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 386
Mixed 283
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 31.5
108% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 244
208% 306 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 108%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
7GB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 154
Mixed 86.3
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.8
311% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E2 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 20.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VX Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback