Intel NUC8BEB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i7BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '24 at 22:36
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8559U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 153
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 416
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 65%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.3
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.5
4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1380 1342 1323 1244 1141 1159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 1035
Mixed 812
SusWrite 1,265
237% 1,049 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 52.9
175% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 497
361% 473 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 196%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3E2 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 24.6
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0A6 DELL U3415W
Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 1,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback