| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | Panasonic CF-52VDA131M (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Panasonic CF52-5 |
| Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130326 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 27 '20 at 10:15 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.5%
Good
|
69% 116 Pts
|
30% 228 Pts
|
14% 230 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Device(10F7 8338) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.961.6.0
|
6.7%
Terrible
|
6% 9.19 fps
|
8% 9.27 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 42 40 40 39 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
37% 166 MB/s
|
58% 18.9 MB/s
|
63% 117 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
91GB free, PID 1666, kingston data traveler 3 128Gb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 29 20 26 28 38 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
26% 22.8 MB/s
|
60% 1.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 56GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
|
52.3%
Above average
|
51% 17.9 GB/s
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
55% 73.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds