Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 06:42
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 516
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2336 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 126
Parallax 108
7% 81 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 115
Splatting 115
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 76 81 87 90 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 207
Write 128
Mixed 127
SusWrite 85.1
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 15.4
53% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.6
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 20.9
18% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 48%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
84GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 208 204 206 207 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 213
Write 202
Mixed 192
SusWrite 201
46% 202 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 33.4
107% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 47.2
39% 54 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 129%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 95 96 94 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 93.8
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 96.3
65% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Transcend TS512MLK64V6H 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 56.5
71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback