Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130718
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 19 '20 at 23:20
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 512
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2302 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40% Below average
Lighting 12
Reflection 128
Parallax 110
10% 83.1 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 142
Splatting 114
99% 121 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 40%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 106 120 132 131 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 206
Write 130
Mixed 123
SusWrite 122
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 18.2
63% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 42.4
DQ Mixed 17.9
17% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 48%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
84GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 210 207 208 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 214
Write 208
Mixed 194
SusWrite 202
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 32.5
106% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 48.9
40% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 129%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.01G01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 95 97 95 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 109
Write 96.2
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 95.4
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
181% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Transcend TS512MLK64V6H 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $416
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback