Tarox Basic 5261BM

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Tarox Basic 5261BM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8B75-M
Memory	20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130218
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '20 at 12:50
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 92.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 184 76% 127 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 512 56% 442 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 34.5 25% 31.5 fps	MRender 30.8 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 40 29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 243GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 167 166 160 161 162 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.8% Good	Read 256 Write 242 Mixed 232 SusWrite 165 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 35.9 118% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 176 138% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 126%
Drevo Ares 256GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 229GB free Firmware: C2.1.6S SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 297 293 298 297 298 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 744 Write 668 Mixed 629 SusWrite 304 131% 586 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 47.3 157% 59.5 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 544 DQ Mixed 404 320% 438 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 168%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 788GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 35 35 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 433GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 128 129 128 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 126 Write 127 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 127 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF M378B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.7% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 18.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16