Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '20 at 21:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 130
60% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 323
37% 291 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 52
52% 59.9 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 66
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 87 86 6.9 51 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 475
Write 413
Mixed 12
SusWrite 115
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 28.4
83% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 47.9
85% 166 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
137GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 115 114 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 83.7
Write 90.7
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 114
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
189% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
8GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 7.9 8.3 5.8 9.5 3.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 8.2
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 6.6
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.1
212% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback