Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 08 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.45 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 74.9 2-Core 143 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 302 36% 278 Pts	64-Core 297 18% 297 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.6% Average	Lighting 54 Reflection 62.4 Parallax 50.7 44% 55.7 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 54.1 Splatting 64.5 52% 63.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 158 227 35 5.7 50 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.6% Poor	Read 254 Write 222 Mixed 228 SusWrite 89.4 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.5 53% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 196GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 88 87 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 97.3 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 89.8 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16