MSI MS-1763

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GT70 2PC
MotherboardMSI MS-1763  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140502
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 21:25
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 185
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 517
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1106) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 6.78
3% 12.9 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 465 298 249 246 249 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 403
Write 464
Mixed 377
SusWrite 324
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 34.3
117% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 320
243% 328 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 99%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
596GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 108
Mixed 26
SusWrite 131
70% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1763 Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1763

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback