MSI MS-175A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMicro-Star GP70 2PE
MotherboardMSI MS-175A  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 05:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 148
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 239
27% 213 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 9.81
Parallax 2.94
2% 4.86 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 3.65
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 296 294 295 293 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 372
Write 353
Mixed 296
SusWrite 307
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 19.7
99% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 151
121% 175 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 118%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
668GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 126 126 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 33
SusWrite 126
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KFG/8G 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 17.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-175A Builds (Compare 298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-175A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback