Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 00:02
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 200
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 542
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 115
Parallax 106
88% 109 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 100
81% 98.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 SATA M.2 128GB-$72
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 21 28 31 47 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 90%
Toshiba HG6 SATA M.2 128GB
70GB free
Firmware: JUCA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 353 327 199 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 470
Write 411
Mixed 391
SusWrite 229
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 36.6
118% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 330
249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
85GB free
Firmware: 20.01H20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 85 88 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 91.5
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 85.2
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 81 75 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 23.5
Write 58
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 75.6
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
34% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A 320GB
280GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 12 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.36% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 10.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 15.4
18% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 22.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7 - $191

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback