Asrock Z97X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z97X Killer  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2715 x 1527 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160511
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '17 at 02:15
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 650
66% 534 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 59.7
Reflection 57
Parallax 46.4
49% 54.3 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 56
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 845DC EVO 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT03X3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 513
Write 235
Mixed 301
77% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 29.5
134% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 92.5
113% 204 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 150
Mixed 149
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 84
Write 80.5
Mixed 63.9
57% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.33
76% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
864GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 88.5
Write 83.3
Mixed 72.6
61% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.27
72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 55%
Initio INIC-1610P 320GB
282GB free, PID 1e40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 39.3
Mixed 35.7
48% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.36
94% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D3-2400-MR 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 0821 16G-D3-2400-MR 0215 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97X Killer Builds (Compare 693 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97X Killer - $195

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $883
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback