MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 10 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 811
74% 619 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 96.1
Reflection 107
Parallax 99.9
78% 101 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 97
78% 94.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 88%
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.28
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 91.2
54% 75.6 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 57.5
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 253 167 162 194 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,980
Write 898
Mixed 1586
SusWrite 283
263% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 53.1
174% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 403
303% 413 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 169%
Great: 297%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
611GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 32 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
355% Outstanding
Read 5,558
Write 32.8
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 31.9
297% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 318
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 6.4
491% 109 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 355%
Great: 347%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5689
Mixed 10
2,036% 2,850 MB/s
4K Read 322
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1
13,529% 108 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 3.9 2.3 2.8 2.8 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 203
Write 3.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.4
39% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 114%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 6TB
3TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 4.1 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 178
Write 17.3
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 4
66% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 37.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 33.8
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback