MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 302
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 954
92% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,359
84% 1,359 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Dell(1028 3301) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 111
Parallax 95
82% 102 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 99.3
80% 97.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 8A92) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 86.1
54% 74 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 58.4
53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1037 364 274 282 278 272 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 2,258
Mixed 1,728
SusWrite 418
360% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 77.2
276% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 1,094
DQ Mixed 1,152
873% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 245%
Great: 297%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$92
669GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 29 29 30 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
604% Outstanding
Read 7,926
Write 56
Mixed 114
SusWrite 31.6
422% 2,032 MB/s
4K Read 704
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 7
1,077% 238 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 604%
Great: 347%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 25 24 25 25 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 199 199 202 202 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 153
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 199
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 6TB
2TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 209 202 214 215 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 242
Write 203
Mixed 97
SusWrite 208
244% 187 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 91%
Generic Flash Disk 2TB
24GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 14.5
Write 13
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 8.8
17% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.7
143% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 37.4
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 36.3
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,385
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback