Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '20 at 00:52
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 92 1-Core 130 2-Core 259 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 982 88% 743 Pts	64-Core 1,428 88% 1,428 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 851A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 1840 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 73.1 Reflection 76.3 Parallax 74.2 60% 74.5 fps	MRender 78.4 Gravity 70 Splatting 61.3 56% 69.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 425 468 472 470 472 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 403 Write 449 Mixed 367 SusWrite 446 94% 416 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 38.3 144% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 170 162% 249 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 102%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 138 145 242 146 153 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.4% Below average	Read 222 Write 89.1 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 174 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 11.6 51% 16.1 MB/s	DQ Read 14.3 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 14.4 11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FD 2x4GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3400 MHz clocked @ 1700 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 46.5 MC Write 40.2 MC Mixed 35.5 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 27.9 SC Write 44.5 SC Mixed 31.1 99% 34.5 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	399x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $90Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	134x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	129x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	105x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	88x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	74x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	45x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	41x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	41x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	52x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	50x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $532

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $36
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16