Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 177 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 368 50% 369 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 8462) 1GB CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.04% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 9.08 Parallax 10.5 8% 9.92 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.47 Splatting 7.87 8% 9.48 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.04% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 245 261 259 121 32 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.1% Above average	Read 191 Write 97.7 Mixed 139 SusWrite 184 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 23.3 83% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 228 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 130 128% 204 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5040ED58E9W1600 0443 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 17.9 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 17.5 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16