Viglen DQ67SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemViglen DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '17 at 21:59
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 337
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
CLim: 811 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.2
14% 17.4 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 17.4
Splatting 20.2
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 97.1
Mixed 92.2
72% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.27
79% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Corsair CM3X2G1333C9D 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Corsair CM3X2G1333C9D 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Viglen DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback