Dell XPS 730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 730  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0F642F
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 23:59
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 69.5
42% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 146
18% 140 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3681) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 19.7
17% 18.9 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X300 2.5 7MM 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X330
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 30 46 40 73 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.6% Poor
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 50.8
18% 83 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 15.7
57% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 21.2
22% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Toshiba MK1234GSX 120GB-$55
6GB free
Firmware: AH00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 27 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 24.3
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 27.5
17% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 18%
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
2GB free
Firmware: 78.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 54
Write 54.2
Mixed 39.5
37% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 51%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
149GB free
Firmware: 12.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 72.2
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 68.9
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3250310CS 250GB-$33
12GB free
Firmware: 3.AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 56 57 56 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 88.2
Write 85
Mixed 44
SusWrite 57
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.2
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 730 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback