Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E744

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E744  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB26F
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300M-$264
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 86
1-Core 98
2-Core 173
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 254
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 17AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
1.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 6.38
0% 4.12 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.78
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 150 150 142 128 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 466
Write 296
Mixed 210
SusWrite 143
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 27
100% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 256
206% 293 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 105%
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: EXT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 132 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 241
Write 138
Mixed 158
SusWrite 132
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 23.6
109% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 56.6
72% 130 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5428-082.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E744 Builds (Compare 244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E744

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback