Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H57M-USB3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 20:42
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 96
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 159
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 402
45% 355 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.9% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 35.8
30% 34.1 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 35.8
30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 193 211 215 214 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 620
Write 350
Mixed 431
SusWrite 198
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 40.5
132% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 302
224% 297 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 111%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
484GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 241 270 279 274 272 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 447
Mixed 376
SusWrite 248
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 39.9
131% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 328
248% 331 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 121%
Samsung 830 64GB
54GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 118 122 113 124 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 373
Write 121
Mixed 175
SusWrite 118
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 20.8
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 72.6
71% 118 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 53.8
74% 53.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H57M-USB3 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback