PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H57M-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100825 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 03 '20 at 20:24 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 66% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 870-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Marvell Raid VD 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 172 195 187 193 192 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
484GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 225 263 277 272 269 MB/s
|
66.1%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 830 64GB
54GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 113 117 114 114 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 13x |
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 10x |
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 8x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
R7 260XAMD $120Bench 20%, 38,521 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $101 |