Acer Predator G9-591

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Predator G9-591  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Mustang_SLS
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '20 at 06:55
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 78
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 147
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 402
37% 311 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1051) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.63
Reflection 44.6
Parallax 6.34
5% 19.2 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 13.5
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 687 898 889 900 904 855 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1824
Write 914
Mixed 662
SusWrite 855
235% 1,064 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 47
180% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 869
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 371
332% 519 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 207%
Great: 243%
Adata SU800NS38 1TB
479GB free
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 358 343 372 372 375 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 413
Mixed 369
SusWrite 351
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 41.2
136% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 162
146% 215 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$235
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 382 371 396 396 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 417
Mixed 413
SusWrite 374
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 47
158% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 165
170% 277 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
535GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 398 389 412 412 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 443
Write 419
Mixed 373
SusWrite 390
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 38
136% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 182
103% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF M471A1K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 19.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-591 Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-591

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback