Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 04:37
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 22.9
2-Core 33.1
27% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 51.2
8-Core 72.7
8% 61.9 Pts
64-Core 90
6% 90 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 4.78
3% 4.44 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 6.39
4% 4.76 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
873GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 18 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 18
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.1
58% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 0467 RMT3190MN76F8F1600 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.3
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 11.7
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback