Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 23:30
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 47.9
1-Core 11.2
2-Core 21.4
21% 26.8 Pts
4-Core 76.8
8-Core 90.3
11% 83.6 Pts
64-Core 83
5% 83 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4274
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.44
2% 3.18 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 5.09
3% 3.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 28 28 27 29 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 15.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 25.7
19% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 12%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 0467 RMT3190MN76F8F1600 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.5
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback