Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemToshiba Satellite C55-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 09:07
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34% Below average
Memory 60.2
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 35.9
29% 39.5 Pts
4-Core 47.2
8-Core 52.6
7% 49.9 Pts
64-Core 49.7
3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.88
0% 0.78 fps
MRender 1.29
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.88 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM0P3M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 71 74 64 58 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 99.8
Write 101
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 67.5
55% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.1
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback