HP 870-250no

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP 870-250no  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '20 at 09:03
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 187
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 374
45% 347 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
HP(103C 82FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.1% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 104
Parallax 93.5
80% 98.7 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 95.6
77% 93.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 258 124 96 93 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 467
Mixed 389
SusWrite 167
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60
203% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 353
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
281GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 130 134 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 145
Write 136
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 132
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 23.9
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-250no Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: HP 870-250no

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback