Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110429
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '17 at 18:35
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5680
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 503
49% 404 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.87
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 29
20% 24.9 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 25.1
22% 27.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41
871GB free
Firmware: MK7OA5C0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 107
Mixed 31.8
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.35
91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST31000524NS 1TB-$54
640GB free
Firmware: 1309 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65% Good
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 29.9
62% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.55
125% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65%
Great: 75%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$46
425GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 114
Write 104
Mixed 13.4
56% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.41
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST37500NSSUN750G 0743A2REB5 750GB
277GB free
Firmware: 3AZY Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.6% Below average
Read 61.6
Write 59
Mixed 38.9
40% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.23
62% 0.58 MB/s
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
236GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 81.1
Write 80.2
Mixed 44.2
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.37
88% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 51%
Dell PERC 6/i 600GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 162
Mixed 120
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.75
151% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 112%
Dell PERC 6/i 299GB
128GB free
Firmware: 1.22
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 53.6
Mixed 45.9
38% 50.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.57
126% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Guerrilla Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Guerrilla

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback