Dell PowerEdge R710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge R710
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R710  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 15 '19 at 15:06
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5640
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 25.1
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 139
40% 78.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 455
40% 341 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC 6/i 600GB
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 44 41 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 139
Write 38.9
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 40.9
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125R7BFR8C-G7 6x2GB
6 of 18 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 6
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 285
14% 285 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R710 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback