HP EliteBook 820 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 820 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 225A
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '20 at 10:51
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 194
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 264
34% 259 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 225A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 5.63
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 7.19
5% 6.91 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 12.2
8% 8.76 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 205 218 202 217 212 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 308
Mixed 295
SusWrite 211
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48.3
180% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 164
165% 268 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1315 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 820 G2 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 820 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback