Alienware Aurora R8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora R8  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 02XRCM
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 15:36
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 832
86% 695 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 86A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 84.8
Parallax 78.3
78% 86.5 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 82.4
Splatting 70.1
68% 85.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpemkf256g8 NVMe INTEL 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2377
Write 1,078
Mixed 821
311% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 46.3
187% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 78.5
146% 316 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 241%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$75
15GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 448
Mixed 324
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 52.2
180% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 226
206% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
24GB free
Firmware: UE3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 90 91 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 399
Write 201
Mixed 221
SusWrite 94.1
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 13.3
65% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 41.7
47% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
422GB free
Firmware: CC36
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 86 85 87 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 85.4
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 68%
WL1500GSA6472B 1.5TB
572GB free
Firmware: 07.06E.V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 140 140 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 116
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 139
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 029E CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 37.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R8 Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Alienware Aurora R8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback