Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics180% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory72.8 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 04:11
Run Duration328 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 1,178
101% 868 Pts
64-Core 1,925
119% 1,925 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,348
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 236
Parallax 275
211% 256 fps
MRender 294
Gravity 230
Splatting 153
177% 226 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 180%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1720 1161 28 153 168 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2,988
Write 1943
Mixed 1,333
SusWrite 546
376% 1,702 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 72.4
224% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 633
DQ Write 1,063
DQ Mixed 430
444% 709 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 261%
Great: 541%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
8GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 502
Write 475
Mixed 388
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 53
191% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 288
234% 333 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 118%
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
3GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 479
Mixed 324
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 53.7
189% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 274
226% 326 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 107%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
291GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 215 286 332 337 299 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 549
Write 386
Mixed 297
SusWrite 286
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 42.9
151% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 221
175% 236 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 97%
Great: 182%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
74GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 83.8
Write 81
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 97
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52%
Great: 67%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
33GB free
Firmware: 2BA30003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 72 69 70 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 69.8
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion Desk 320GB
13GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 53 53 54 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 57.5
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 50.9
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 50%
Seagate BACKUP+ 500GB
13GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 58 65 57 60 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 74
Write 71.5
Mixed 30
SusWrite 61.5
43% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate BUP Slim 500GB
3GB free
Firmware: 0302
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.5
Write 54
Mixed 23.2
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 61%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
55GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 64 63 65 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 50
Write 41.8
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 64.1
36% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 59%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
6GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 37
Write 25.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 26.4
29% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.9
127% 3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 80GB
2600, 2600, 2600, 2600, 2600, 2600, 2600, 2600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 54.7
MC Mixed 33.6
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 12.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback