Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '20 at 12:58
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 76
1-Core 144
2-Core 292
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 1,018
97% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 100
59% 80.6 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 57.7
54% 67 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,570
Write 2,341
Mixed 1,421
468% 2,111 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 95.4
316% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 1,182
DQ Mixed 1236
929% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
386GB free
Firmware: 3L1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 807 638 636 635 636 634 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,348
Write 1,104
Mixed 866
SusWrite 664
223% 996 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 82.4
281% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,397
DQ Write 1,238
DQ Mixed 1,196
930% 1,277 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 240%
Great: 259%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
119GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 66 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 35
Write 68.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 67.5
37% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 87%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
466GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 110 107 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 109
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 59%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
262GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 77.3
Write 78.4
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 76
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
11GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 28 29 28 28 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 98.9
Write 26.8
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 27.4
58% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 3
214% 4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.3% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 27.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback