Asus P7H55-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-V (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 180 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 339 46% 344 Pts	64-Core 331 20% 331 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1485 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 25 Reflection 20 Parallax 23.8 20% 22.9 fps	MRender 29.5 Gravity 26.1 Splatting 0.13 13% 18.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 65GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 32 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 89.4 Write 94.2 Mixed 59.1 SusWrite 29.5 50% 68.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 58%
Seagate ST3802110A 80GB-$70 737 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 6GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 23 25 25 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 102 Write 22.7 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 24.2 35% 47.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 38%
Seagate ST3160215AS 160GB-$32 6,007 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 6.1 7.4 5.6 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.41% Terrible	Read 9.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 13 SusWrite 8.8 7% 9.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 5.41% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 800, 800, 800 MHz 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.7% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 6 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-V Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-V

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	5x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	5x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GTS 450NvidiaBench 7%, 25,436 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	2x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	14x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	4x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16