Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 07:58
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 32.4
1-Core 60
2-Core 46.7
30% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 165
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.1
18% 19.5 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB-$30
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 2.4 6.9 7.2 5.9 6.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 54%
Samsung HM161GI 160GB
29GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 67
Write 22.2
Mixed 40
SusWrite 55.5
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A CT51264BD160B 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 241
17% 241 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A68HM-H Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A68HM-H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback