Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160512
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateDec 30 '16 at 00:42
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 103
2-Core 208
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 693
67% 550 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 1990 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 78.1
63% 78.5 fps
MRender 83.4
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 64
59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 989
Mixed 1,231
267% 1,199 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 51.4
199% 74 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 157
164% 273 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 191%
Great: 283%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
39GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 492
Write 341
Mixed 352
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 23.3
122% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 75.5
104% 192 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 118%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 153
Mixed 136
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.27
107% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
42GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 41.8
Write 41.3
Mixed 41.4
54% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.96
4K Write 7.72
4K Mixed 3.99
432% 6.89 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 38.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 102%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $448
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback