bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DZ87KLT75K
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 567
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 64.6
61% 71.4 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 68.8
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
23GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 89 82 91 89 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 118
Write 154
Mixed 129
SusWrite 88.7
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 30.1
108% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 117
100% 146 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
111GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 266 269 270 270 269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 341
Write 325
Mixed 300
SusWrite 279
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 47.4
154% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 173
146% 213 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 128 147 141 159 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 150
Mixed 96.5
SusWrite 145
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
222% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Portable 3.0 500GB
7GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 33
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 96.7
79% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Seagate Backup+ SL 1TB
33GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 59
Write 42.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 60.5
67% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.1% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback