Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3845 97 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 18 2-Core 36.1 28% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 71.2 8-Core 72.2 10% 71.7 Pts	64-Core 72.1 4% 72.1 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 0F31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.12 Parallax 0.94 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.32 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M6302 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0822A SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 210 213 215 213 213 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.6% Average	Read 225 Write 211 Mixed 190 SusWrite 211 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 19.9 65% 21.2 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 146 116% 161 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 50%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,737 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	0.55% Terrible	Read 1 Write 1 Mixed 1 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.98 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 0.55% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H-I 1x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16