Asus A6R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus A6R  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK A6R
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 14:29
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.50GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Memory 49.7
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 14.5
22% 26.2 Pts
4-Core 14.7
8-Core 13.5
2% 14.1 Pts
64-Core 14.1
1% 14.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200M
Asus(1043 1182) 128MB
Driver: Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.17
Reflection 0.23
0% 0.2 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HC 160GB-$78
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LQ100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 20 52 53 55 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 55.7
Write 56.5
Mixed 36
SusWrite 45.5
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 34%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 3.9 3.9 3.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.46% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.7
9% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.46%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.99% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 1
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback