Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 22 '20 at 21:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 207
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 497
56% 438 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
49.9% Average
Lighting 62.3
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 83.8
51% 69.5 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 54
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Shinedisk M746 PLUS 128G 128GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 139 144 145 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 226
Write 145
Mixed 162
SusWrite 142
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 28.3
97% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 85.3
DQ Mixed 37.4
34% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
362GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 70 71 71 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 73
Mixed 47
SusWrite 70.5
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback