Lenovo 2742A13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 2742A13  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory4.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 17:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 472
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 26.1
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 9.2 44 14 111 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 424
Write 263
Mixed 282
SusWrite 60
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 10.6
54% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 44.9
DQ Mixed 26.2
34% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
61GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 60 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 59.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 61.4
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
80GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 119 120 119 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 120
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 10GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2742A13 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2742A13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback