MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK OPT BOOST (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI Z270 TOMAHAWK OPT BOOST (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory15.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 14:36
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 150
2-Core 281
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 666
72% 573 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 62.3
56% 67.7 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 65
Splatting 56.1
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 274
Mixed 276
73% 333 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 17.4
75% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 90.8
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 41.1
43% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 52%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
238GB free
Firmware: R0427ANR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 464
Mixed 448
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 58.6
192% 69.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 280
233% 336 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 118%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
114GB free
Firmware: LE1i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 237
Mixed 240
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 41.6
169% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 204
161% 226 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 88%
Nvme INTEL MEMPEK1W01 14GB
13GB free
Firmware: K3110300 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 803
Write 140
Mixed 237
84% 393 MB/s
4K Read 187
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 129
495% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 874
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 245
247% 422 MB/s
Poor: 140% Great: 243%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
680GB free
Firmware: GN003J
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.8
Write 95.7
Mixed 19
50% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 56%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CV12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 130
Mixed 65
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 99%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 142
Mixed 126
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
197% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD44G240082 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8502 PSD44G240082 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.4% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 21.3
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 20.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 TOMAHAWK OPT BOOST (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK OPT BOOST (MS-7A68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $913
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback