Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 270E5J/2570EJ  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT270E5R-KD9S
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150623
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateJan 20 '20 at 06:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 84.7
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 93.2
53% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 169
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C737) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.07
Reflection 3.62
Parallax 5.06
2% 3.91 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 5.35
3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT04K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 103 106 107 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 428
Write 118
Mixed 138
SusWrite 98.1
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 21.4
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 99.3
DQ Mixed 58.1
72% 132 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 79%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB
558GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.2
Mixed 28
SusWrite 15.5
19% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.3
138% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13%
Great: 63%
Iptime External 320GB
149GB free
Firmware: 2210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 15.7
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 270E5J/2570EJ Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback