Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	86.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus B75M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140707
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 12:21
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 175 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 237 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2264 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 120 Parallax 113 87% 113 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 100 Splatting 107 86% 104 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 163 105 108 107 105 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47% Average	Read 178 Write 105 Mixed 115 SusWrite 152 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 24.5 84% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 75.6 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 171 109% 122 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 90%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 725GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 246 Write 235 Mixed 91.1 SusWrite 52.1 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.2 254% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 77%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 724GB free Firmware: 16.01H16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Read 187 Write 191 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 52.1 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/2G Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 GR1333D364L9/4G 830B M2X4G64CB88B7N-DG 14GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.8% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 20.1 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 58.1 69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	170x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	113x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	69x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x
TA1D0120A 120GBGalaxBench 61%, 4,895 samples	22x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	22x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	29x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16