Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 13:37
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 210
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 454
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2289 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 121
Parallax 114
88% 114 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 102
Splatting 109
88% 107 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 457
Mixed 348
94% 424 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 41.3
156% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 212
183% 268 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
456GB free
Firmware: 16.01H16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 71 76 75 75 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 227
Write 232
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 73.3
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
257% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
457GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 76 74 75 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 198
Write 192
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 73.3
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.4
274% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
89GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 87 89 80 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 57.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 86.8
80% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/2G Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 GR1333D364L9/4G 830B M2X4G64CB88B7N-DG 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback